$5 Premier League title trades have tighter spreads here than elsewhere, though not by much.
Customer reviews and ratings for Signet — read verified experiences before you decide.
$5 Premier League title trades have tighter spreads here than elsewhere, though not by much.
Still risked $1500 on the Best Picture odds which paid correctly.
Still accurate when the launch was confirmed.
Payout was fair but wish they’d covered more potential departures.
Their brackets were narrower than others—better payoff if you nail the date precisely. Fewer markets than I’d like though.
Not instant, but quicker than the three-day estimates I've seen elsewhere. Only gripe is the lack of progress tracking between submission and arrival.
But the candlesticks update faster than any brokerage’s live feed, and volume bars actually reflect order book depth rather than just trades.
The £60 I put on a satellite deployment resolved when the agency tweeted thruster confirmation. Wish the app would suggest similar markets automatically though.
Election market question got answered accurately within 45 minutes during New Hampshire primaries.
Placed three election trades during a conference call. Chart touch targets could be bigger but execution beats desktop for speed.
Might lower size next time.
Still took €150 in profit despite the minor delay.
Not bad, but wish they normalized outliers faster.
Signet support replied to my celeb market inquiry in 47 minutes with relevant trading history attached.
Interface is functional but could use more customizable technical overlays for niche events.
Won £75 but could’ve maxed exposure earlier. Markets still price more efficiently than anywhere for Westminster though.
3 at legacy books. Missing Asian theater breakdowns.
Signet called the space launch market wrong by two days, cost me $25.
Disputed that 88th minute goal market for eleven hours before yielding to FIFA match reports.
Spent twenty minutes scrolling past cryptocurrency IPO nonsense before finding four legitimate listing date markets with SEC filing-based resolutions. Section organization needs work but depth exists.